« Third Weather Report: Yahoo! Launched New Search Index Last Night | Main | Firefox Toolbar: Beta no more! »

July 26, 2005

Announcing the Y!Q Challenge Winners

Back in May I announced the Y!Q Challenge by saying:

What if there was a concrete incentive to play with some of the stuff we've been building? Like maybe a cold, hard $5,000. That'd buy you a nice new
Powerbook
. Or a dozen
iPods
. Or a year's worth of unlimited music for 100 of your closest friends. That's what the Y!Q Challenge is all about. Your job is to impress us with your use of Y!Q on your web site. Our job is to be impressed and fork over the cash.

Our panel of expert judges has reviewed all the submissions and asked me to reveal them here. They based their judging on four main criteria:

  • Relevance: How effectively have you set context so that Y!Q produces results with maximum relevance?
  • Prominence: How prominent is the placement of Y!Q on your site?
  • Placement: How creative and intuitive are the placements of Y!Q icons on your site?
  • Usefulness: To what degree does Y!Q enhance the overall user experience on your site?

Here's what they said...

Third Place

Site: Particletree.com

Implementation by

Kevin Hale ,
Chris Campbell
,
Ryan Campbell

Particletree did a tremendous job with prominence, topping all entrants with heavy visual customization that integrated the look and feel of their Y!Q implementation with the rest of their site. Y!Q links were also included on most of the articles on the site, and in many places within each article, something undoubtedly made simpler by their implementation of "Lazy Linking," an integration of Y!Q with the TextPattern content management system that they use.

Second Place

Site: Owensperformance.com

Implementation by

Irvin Owens Jr

Owensperformance did a great job with prominence, with Y!Q links being available for all article headlines on the home page, as well as the detailed articles. Relevance was also a strength, with context being set fairly effectively in most cases. The combination of effective prominence, relevance and the nature of the content on the site contributed to strong overall usefulness.

First Place

Site: Geekextreme.com

Implementation by

Gil Rutkowski

Geekextreme did a solid job with relevance, perhaps aided by their development of a Y!Q Mambo that integrates Y!Q with the Mambo content management system. The integration provided a simple way to set context for Y!Q and it appears they have taken full advantage of it to their benefit, and to the benefit of visitors to their site. Prominence was aided by a nice visual customization for the overlay. The frequency of fresh content on the site, combined with the solid relevance resulted in great overall usefulness.

Congrats to the winners and thanks to everyone who entered the challenge. We saw some very interesting and creative uses of Y!Q and look forward to many more. By the way - we added a few in-line Y!Q's to this article to illustrate some other Y!Q usage examples. Hope you find them useful.

Jeremy Zawodny
Yahoo! Search

Comments

Cool. This would be great with Yahoo 360!

Congrats to the winners!!! I still think my site ROCKS with the best implementation of Y!Q. (www.GoLexa.net)I'm guessing it was bypassed because I was using the Google API and not Yahoo's. Could you post some of the other sites that were in the contest? I'd like to see some of the creativity. ED

Prominence: How prominent is the placement of Y!Q on your site?
____________________________________

* * Prominence * *
should NOT have been a factor - blending in naturally with a sites' design - or not as
IN YOUR FACE
as the winners' use of it, would have been more appropriate

First of all congrats to the winners.

I have to agree with the other posters, Prominence was a dumb factor. In fact, based on the winners, no offense but I reckon the contest was really poor and not worth entering. Probably some sour grapes on my part.

The winners all look like the copied the same Ajax implementation, at least the UI portion of it. They're all the same! I don't see any innovation here.

My entry combined ALL the Yahoo Web services, including Y!Q and Flickr and RSS.

Here's my entry: http://www.FrancisShanahan.com/reader.aspx

GoLexa is awesome and definitely should've beaten the winners imho.
-fs

Calm down Fancis. Also, your implementation sucks.

Hey Francis,
I had seen your site before I knew it was in the contest and was impressed with what you did. I agree, I seen very little innovation in any of the winners. I'm guessing Yahoo probably is hiding the good ones like yours and Golexas' because those sites have implementations that they could actually use....LOL