Comments on: Wikipedia SearchMonkey App Now Default On

By: kocsog

kocsog — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:48:42 +0000

Wiki won’t never 100% reliable

By: Sağlık

Sağlık — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:00:00 +0000

You’re basically putting an ever-changing source of disputable “facts” in front of your search audience.manken

By: Link Degisimi

Link Degisimi — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:06:48 +0000

I have to agree lot of the facts on Wikipedia are disputed.

By: Mikes

Mikes — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:32:57 +0000

Wikipedia is great!

By: george sill

george sill — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:29:50 +0000

I have to agree lot of the facts on Wikipedia are disputed.

By: Kyle Winland

Kyle Winland — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:48:35 +0000

Wikipedia has been great. Its been useful to search unknown topics and find out what they really mean. thank you Wikipedia.

By: Biofir

Biofir — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:40:07 +0000

Cool. What if I search for Britney, in example, will Wikipedia show who is Britney Spears or another Britney along with her photo? I must try it.

By: 花蓮民宿

花蓮民宿 — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:49:30 +0000

That’s NOT the way to get back to the number 2 position in the search market, much less to overtake Google and challenge them for number 1.

By: 花蓮

花蓮 — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:30:23 +0000

Make certain you collect a steady and varied collection of links

By: drenzul

drenzul — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:45:31 +0000

While wiki isn’t always 100% reliable, its often a very good start point for information and most of the references on wiki also contain links to other sources…..

Whats wrong with giving people easy access to that?

Relying on ANY one source is bad…. Are you saying that basically because no source on the internet can be considered totally reliable that search engines should just give a blank page for every query? That would make them popular!