<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Robots-Nocontent for Page Sections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Body Jewelry</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-2/#comment-4374</link>
		<dc:creator>Body Jewelry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4374</guid>
		<description>Ok, what if the links in the nav area are important? should they too be excluded?  And if so, do I do that in the template so even the index page&#039;s nav content is ignored?

Finally I am not sure, does belong actually on the page?  &quot;Less than&quot; td class=&quot;robots-nocontent&quot; &quot;Greater than &quot; if the nav is in a table cell?

thanks

Michael
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, what if the links in the nav area are important? should they too be excluded?  And if so, do I do that in the template so even the index page&#8217;s nav content is ignored?</p>
<p>Finally I am not sure, does belong actually on the page?  &#8220;Less than&#8221; td class=&#8221;robots-nocontent&#8221; &#8220;Greater than &#8221; if the nav is in a table cell?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Apache</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-2/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Apache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>Does this accomplish the same thing as Google AdSense section targetting?  Just a lot more bytes?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this accomplish the same thing as Google AdSense section targetting?  Just a lot more bytes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pyle</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-2/#comment-4372</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4372</guid>
		<description>Can the class=&quot;robots-nocontent&quot; be applied to a  as well as a div or span?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the class=&#8221;robots-nocontent&#8221; be applied to a  as well as a div or span?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamaiel</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-2/#comment-4371</link>
		<dc:creator>Gamaiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4371</guid>
		<description>I like controlling this in robots.txt but I don&#039;t think that CSS or Xpath is a good idea, it would be rare that you would need to be so specific.

Simply providing the class or id in a new directive would be the best bet. Something like:

Nocontent-class: advertising
Nocontent-id: nav
Nocontent-id: footer
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like controlling this in robots.txt but I don&#8217;t think that CSS or Xpath is a good idea, it would be rare that you would need to be so specific.</p>
<p>Simply providing the class or id in a new directive would be the best bet. Something like:</p>
<p>Nocontent-class: advertising<br />
Nocontent-id: nav<br />
Nocontent-id: footer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Silver CZ Jewelry</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-1/#comment-4370</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Silver CZ Jewelry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4370</guid>
		<description>Robot non-content should be applied Internaional Yahoo sites as well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robot non-content should be applied Internaional Yahoo sites as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exclusive Home Furnishings</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-1/#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>Exclusive Home Furnishings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>Since when search engines start dictating the search result ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when search engines start dictating the search result ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Show Displays</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-1/#comment-4368</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Show Displays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4368</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if diversity of content should be enough to drive more traffic to a website (which is what this seems to amount to). I guess you don&#039;t have to use the feature if you don&#039;t like it, but it won&#039;t exactly be easy to implement if you do like it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if diversity of content should be enough to drive more traffic to a website (which is what this seems to amount to). I guess you don&#8217;t have to use the feature if you don&#8217;t like it, but it won&#8217;t exactly be easy to implement if you do like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Underwood</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-1/#comment-4367</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Underwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4367</guid>
		<description>You say you did &quot;a little homework&quot;, but I wish you had done more. Go to this posting to see a list of selective indexing directives which have already been implemented: &lt;a href=&quot;http://wunderwood.org/most_casual_observer/2007/05/selective_page_indexing_direct.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wunderwood.org/most_casual_observer/2007/05/selective_page_indexing_direct.html&lt;/a&gt;

The &quot;don&#039;t index&quot; sense of this directive is known to be confusing. That could have been fixed with more than &quot;a little&quot; homework.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say you did &#8220;a little homework&#8221;, but I wish you had done more. Go to this posting to see a list of selective indexing directives which have already been implemented: <a href="http://wunderwood.org/most_casual_observer/2007/05/selective_page_indexing_direct.html" rel="nofollow">http://wunderwood.org/most_casual_observer/2007/05/selective_page_indexing_direct.html</a></p>
<p>The &#8220;don&#8217;t index&#8221; sense of this directive is known to be confusing. That could have been fixed with more than &#8220;a little&#8221; homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Clothing &#38; Dog Collars</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-1/#comment-4366</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Clothing &#38; Dog Collars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 02:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4366</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the new feature!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the new feature!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/comment-page-1/#comment-4365</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/#comment-4365</guid>
		<description>Well thanks a lot Yahoo. My site which I pay to have indexed in the yahoo directory just lost every single ranking! Great. And I have no clue how to get it back. Oh and whats best of all is that the sites that now have my place on the rankings are useless sites that have barely any backlinks even.

My site has been around for 6 years as one of the best modeling advice sites online. Google has me as top as well as msn. Now I can&#039;t even find my site on yahoo?

Whats going on? I don&#039;t even know how to fix it. Can someone give me a plain english answer&gt; or put it back to the old way where well deserved sites have the top spots.

My hole life income is online so it is quite important. I just don&#039;t know how to fix it. Please help me out here so I can at least get back up there.

Thanks
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thanks a lot Yahoo. My site which I pay to have indexed in the yahoo directory just lost every single ranking! Great. And I have no clue how to get it back. Oh and whats best of all is that the sites that now have my place on the rankings are useless sites that have barely any backlinks even.</p>
<p>My site has been around for 6 years as one of the best modeling advice sites online. Google has me as top as well as msn. Now I can&#8217;t even find my site on yahoo?</p>
<p>Whats going on? I don&#8217;t even know how to fix it. Can someone give me a plain english answer> or put it back to the old way where well deserved sites have the top spots.</p>
<p>My hole life income is online so it is quite important. I just don&#8217;t know how to fix it. Please help me out here so I can at least get back up there.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
