<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weather Report: Yahoo! Search Index Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Decorative Throw Pillows</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3833</link>
		<dc:creator>Decorative Throw Pillows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 21:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3833</guid>
		<description>Is there some kind of aging delay on the new algo update ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some kind of aging delay on the new algo update ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scented Candles</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3832</link>
		<dc:creator>Scented Candles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 21:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3832</guid>
		<description>Totally dissapointed with the algo update.....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally dissapointed with the algo update&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Furnishings &#38; Decor</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Furnishings &#38; Decor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 20:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3831</guid>
		<description>The latest update was weird and my ranking drop all the way to 400 from top ten.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest update was weird and my ranking drop all the way to 400 from top ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3830</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3830</guid>
		<description>Is there any update on this?  Is Yahoo still sorting things out with the reindex and spam?  Thousands of my serps have seemingly been dropped from yahoo and it started with this last update.  I have seen no change since.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any update on this?  Is Yahoo still sorting things out with the reindex and spam?  Thousands of my serps have seemingly been dropped from yahoo and it started with this last update.  I have seen no change since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3829</guid>
		<description>
Hello again,

Perhaps patience is a good policy. My previous post  may have been premature. I did the search just now, one day later, and Im back up to a ranking of #2. Thats more accurate.

Thank you,

JP
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again,</p>
<p>Perhaps patience is a good policy. My previous post  may have been premature. I did the search just now, one day later, and Im back up to a ranking of #2. Thats more accurate.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3828</guid>
		<description>Regarding the new Yahoo Search Engine

I find the changes very disturbing. So much so that I&#039;ve gone back to Google.

Ive not made any changes to my site, yet Ive gone from #1 to no ranking at all. I always came up as #1 or #2 in the over 2 million sites found. The search words are Chinese Porcelain, and for many years Ive been in the top 10. Ive not tried to trick the bots and spiders by creating hundreds of pages, nor multiple keywords. In fact, I have only 30 pages with just a handful of keywords on my main page. I dont sell anything either. This, compared to my nearest competitor who has 1,200 pages with hundreds of keywords. and selling items as well. I was always on top, now Ive disappeared completely.

Im not sure if I like the new changes. Maybe I should create about 1,170 additional pages, fill up with hundreds of keywords, and sell things in order to compete. Seems unfair. I like the old Yahoo search engine better.

JP
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the new Yahoo Search Engine</p>
<p>I find the changes very disturbing. So much so that I&#8217;ve gone back to Google.</p>
<p>Ive not made any changes to my site, yet Ive gone from #1 to no ranking at all. I always came up as #1 or #2 in the over 2 million sites found. The search words are Chinese Porcelain, and for many years Ive been in the top 10. Ive not tried to trick the bots and spiders by creating hundreds of pages, nor multiple keywords. In fact, I have only 30 pages with just a handful of keywords on my main page. I dont sell anything either. This, compared to my nearest competitor who has 1,200 pages with hundreds of keywords. and selling items as well. I was always on top, now Ive disappeared completely.</p>
<p>Im not sure if I like the new changes. Maybe I should create about 1,170 additional pages, fill up with hundreds of keywords, and sell things in order to compete. Seems unfair. I like the old Yahoo search engine better.</p>
<p>JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sreejith</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>Sreejith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t this would affect me since Yahoo! doesn&#039;t provide any traffic for my content. Anyway, it&#039;s really exciting to expect something more. Especially since everything is gonna go tumbling up and down.

Read my post on this topic :) :- &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmaster-dome.com/?p=89&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://webmaster-dome.com/?p=89&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t this would affect me since Yahoo! doesn&#8217;t provide any traffic for my content. Anyway, it&#8217;s really exciting to expect something more. Especially since everything is gonna go tumbling up and down.</p>
<p>Read my post on this topic :) :- <a href="http://webmaster-dome.com/?p=89" rel="nofollow">http://webmaster-dome.com/?p=89</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wurtele</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wurtele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>Dropped from being indexed by Yahoo and we are unable to find out why.

Google index&#039;s 20,500 of our pages at www.lawyersandsettlements.com , many with a page rank of 6, and Yahoo index&#039;s 5 pages.

Yahoo gives 14 reasons a site may be dropped.

I believe we comply with all 14 of yahoos requirements for a legitimate web site- we have 5 full time writers that create original content for us as well as a digest of information.
	We have zero pages that harm accuracy, diversity or relevance of search results -
	We have zero pages dedicated to directing the user to another page
	We have zero pages that have substantially the same content as other pages
	We have zero sites with numerous, unnecessary virtual hostnames  we do have 20 sub domains.
	 We have zero pages auto generated or of of little value
	We have zero  pages using methods to artificially inflate search engine ranking
	Nowhere do we use text that is hidden from the user
	We have zero pages that give the search engine different content than what the end-user sees
	We have zero excessively cross-linking sites to inflate a site&#039;s apparent popularity, we do cross link to a very few directly related sites.
	We have zero pages built primarily for the search engines
	We never mention let alone misuse a competitor name.
	We have zero sites offering the same content, Other sites do copy us and are sent Cease and Desist orders to them and their Service providers.
	We have zero pop-ups, interfering with user navigation
	We have zero pages that seem deceptive, fraudulent or provide a poor user experience.
And we dont allow robots to crawl our moderated forums thus avoiding the possibility of someone sneaking in bad outbound links.
I too want Yahoo to succeed as a great search engine.
Our site has thousands of visitors every day, all from google.
Is there something in yahoos algorithms that is misreading our site or
Is their something about our site that I dont know about?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dropped from being indexed by Yahoo and we are unable to find out why.</p>
<p>Google index&#8217;s 20,500 of our pages at <a href="http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com</a> , many with a page rank of 6, and Yahoo index&#8217;s 5 pages.</p>
<p>Yahoo gives 14 reasons a site may be dropped.</p>
<p>I believe we comply with all 14 of yahoos requirements for a legitimate web site- we have 5 full time writers that create original content for us as well as a digest of information.<br />
	We have zero pages that harm accuracy, diversity or relevance of search results -<br />
	We have zero pages dedicated to directing the user to another page<br />
	We have zero pages that have substantially the same content as other pages<br />
	We have zero sites with numerous, unnecessary virtual hostnames  we do have 20 sub domains.<br />
	 We have zero pages auto generated or of of little value<br />
	We have zero  pages using methods to artificially inflate search engine ranking<br />
	Nowhere do we use text that is hidden from the user<br />
	We have zero pages that give the search engine different content than what the end-user sees<br />
	We have zero excessively cross-linking sites to inflate a site&#8217;s apparent popularity, we do cross link to a very few directly related sites.<br />
	We have zero pages built primarily for the search engines<br />
	We never mention let alone misuse a competitor name.<br />
	We have zero sites offering the same content, Other sites do copy us and are sent Cease and Desist orders to them and their Service providers.<br />
	We have zero pop-ups, interfering with user navigation<br />
	We have zero pages that seem deceptive, fraudulent or provide a poor user experience.<br />
And we dont allow robots to crawl our moderated forums thus avoiding the possibility of someone sneaking in bad outbound links.<br />
I too want Yahoo to succeed as a great search engine.<br />
Our site has thousands of visitors every day, all from google.<br />
Is there something in yahoos algorithms that is misreading our site or<br />
Is their something about our site that I dont know about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>As things settle down my main keywords are using Directory Title, one major keyword is good, the other keyword move from page 3 to page 6. We are in the process of cleaning our htm code, pages where we lost ground have retuned to its rightful spot. No black hat, its not our nature. Suffering, is more like it.

Some spam has moved off page one, but others with duplicate or mulitiple sites and pages have move up, with at least one url per page.

That being said, for those who spend to much time searching spam and reporting it! Just work on your own site it will bring more benefit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As things settle down my main keywords are using Directory Title, one major keyword is good, the other keyword move from page 3 to page 6. We are in the process of cleaning our htm code, pages where we lost ground have retuned to its rightful spot. No black hat, its not our nature. Suffering, is more like it.</p>
<p>Some spam has moved off page one, but others with duplicate or mulitiple sites and pages have move up, with at least one url per page.</p>
<p>That being said, for those who spend to much time searching spam and reporting it! Just work on your own site it will bring more benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bays</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3824</link>
		<dc:creator>Bays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2007/01/19/weather-report-yahoo-search-index-update-8/#comment-3824</guid>
		<description>Blake, you&#039;re whining and you post too much.

While I don&#039;t think this is the best update in the world, it&#039;s not really much worse than Google. In fact, I think Yahoo search has been better than Google for awhile. I actually find what I&#039;m looking for more quickly with Yahoo (but still takes work). Google brings up everything but what I&#039;m looking for, especially when I do academic searches. With them it seems to be all about what site has more clout, not what words are next to one another on the page. I like not having to put my phrases in quotes so much when I use Yahoo. I wish I wouldn&#039;t have to do it at all though. My favorite results would have to be Google in 2002/2003. I never had to use operators to find what I wanted.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake, you&#8217;re whining and you post too much.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t think this is the best update in the world, it&#8217;s not really much worse than Google. In fact, I think Yahoo search has been better than Google for awhile. I actually find what I&#8217;m looking for more quickly with Yahoo (but still takes work). Google brings up everything but what I&#8217;m looking for, especially when I do academic searches. With them it seems to be all about what site has more clout, not what words are next to one another on the page. I like not having to put my phrases in quotes so much when I use Yahoo. I wish I wouldn&#8217;t have to do it at all though. My favorite results would have to be Google in 2002/2003. I never had to use operators to find what I wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
