<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching for WWW 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dog Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>Yeah now type www in Yahoo. What do you get? www.cjb.net Why? Probably due to sponsors appearing in the normal listing. Very naughty yahoo!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah now type www in Yahoo. What do you get? <a href="http://www.cjb.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.cjb.net</a> Why? Probably due to sponsors appearing in the normal listing. Very naughty yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ahumibe</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ahumibe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>Why edit results just to make them look more pleasing? Doesn&#039;t it just hi light the flaw in the search algorithm?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why edit results just to make them look more pleasing? Doesn&#8217;t it just hi light the flaw in the search algorithm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2970</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 09:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/#comment-2970</guid>
		<description>I wonder if, due to Google&#039;s PageRank feature, searching for &quot;www&quot; on Google is really more or less determining what the most popular websites (or at least the most popularly-visited via Google) are. For Yahoo! to be the #1 website is really an achievement! Congratulations!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if, due to Google&#8217;s PageRank feature, searching for &#8220;www&#8221; on Google is really more or less determining what the most popular websites (or at least the most popularly-visited via Google) are. For Yahoo! to be the #1 website is really an achievement! Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anamorata</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2969</link>
		<dc:creator>Anamorata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 05:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/#comment-2969</guid>
		<description>
Also, it&#039;s a little funny that web results #1 and #2 are for the WWW conference, #3 is WWW.com, and the rest are just totally random (hotmail, free mp3s, proboards.com, microsoft). Why are those relevant
to this query, why is proboards better than microsoft. And #1/#2/#3 look rather suspiciously out
of place in this random heap ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, it&#8217;s a little funny that web results #1 and #2 are for the WWW conference, #3 is <a href="http://WWW.com" rel="nofollow">http://WWW.com</a>, and the rest are just totally random (hotmail, free mp3s, proboards.com, microsoft). Why are those relevant<br />
to this query, why is proboards better than microsoft. And #1/#2/#3 look rather suspiciously out<br />
of place in this random heap &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anamorata</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>Anamorata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 05:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>
I also get an &quot;Also try these queries&quot;, 3 irrelevant ads, 3 news results, and a mysterious myweb result above the web results which are way way down the page ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also get an &#8220;Also try these queries&#8221;, 3 irrelevant ads, 3 news results, and a mysterious myweb result above the web results which are way way down the page &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: search-engines-web.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>search-engines-web.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 03:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/05/24/searching-for-www-2006/#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>So, is it safe to assume that these papers give  insights into plans for upcoming Yahoo
Search Algos
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is it safe to assume that these papers give  insights into plans for upcoming Yahoo<br />
Search Algos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
