<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A chat with Andrei Broder (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>With all the talented members of the Yahoo search team it never ceases to amaze me how much spam sneaks through the cracks in the most competitive areas of internet marketing.  The redirects are appalling, search engine spam run rampant.  I can&#039;t believe that it&#039;s so difficult to create an algo that can determine site content, age, linking structure, relevency of linking, relevency of content, keyword density vs content density, etc.  I believe these are a few of the things that could determine &quot;real&quot; content from internet spam.

If you master your search quality then you can give Google a go for a larger peice of the pie.

Good luck as we are all routing for you, the Big G needs some serious competition to keep them &quot;honest&quot;..

Cheers,

Leah
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the talented members of the Yahoo search team it never ceases to amaze me how much spam sneaks through the cracks in the most competitive areas of internet marketing.  The redirects are appalling, search engine spam run rampant.  I can&#8217;t believe that it&#8217;s so difficult to create an algo that can determine site content, age, linking structure, relevency of linking, relevency of content, keyword density vs content density, etc.  I believe these are a few of the things that could determine &#8220;real&#8221; content from internet spam.</p>
<p>If you master your search quality then you can give Google a go for a larger peice of the pie.</p>
<p>Good luck as we are all routing for you, the Big G needs some serious competition to keep them &#8220;honest&#8221;..</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Leah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Mansigian</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Mansigian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/#comment-2711</guid>
		<description>
Why not be in the box and out of the box simultaneously ?  What I mean is have traditional pull precipitated search brought to a higher level of relevancy by having the search be informed by what&#039;s &quot;out of the box&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not be in the box and out of the box simultaneously ?  What I mean is have traditional pull precipitated search brought to a higher level of relevancy by having the search be informed by what&#8217;s &#8220;out of the box&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Utter</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>David Utter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>Dogbert: I just patented the &#039;zero-click&#039; for online shopping.
Dilbert: What does it do? (continues looking at his computer)
Dogbert: You better start clicking on something or else I send you some books.

Book clubs were doing this long before the Internet became popular. Dogbert is going to lose his patent because of prior art.

David Utter
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dogbert: I just patented the &#8216;zero-click&#8217; for online shopping.<br />
Dilbert: What does it do? (continues looking at his computer)<br />
Dogbert: You better start clicking on something or else I send you some books.</p>
<p>Book clubs were doing this long before the Internet became popular. Dogbert is going to lose his patent because of prior art.</p>
<p>David Utter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: search-engines-web.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>search-engines-web.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/03/09/a-chat-with-andrei-broder-part-ii/#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>/// A year or two from now perhaps it will show you where those gas stations are, but only when you are low on gas. So you get information on an as needed, when needed basis without explicitly asking for it. In the same vein, we will move from information retrieval to information supply

There is always the fear of being TOO Dependant on this technology - because eventually there will be Outages

The hi-tech that will allow this technology to be realized  will probably demand continuous ultra high processing power and continuously tracking and archiving personal-preferences information about the users.

While processing power will become a relatively cheap commodity - the privacy implications of continous tracking/archiving   are of concern to some.  Society must decide if giving up privacy is worth being passive.

Anyways, everyone will imitate each others&#039;  features, ... within MONTHs after being introduced.

So, the bottom line is, ...all of these features are interesting and nice, but......NOTHING, can supplant the fact that Search engines - with or without a box - must have Extremely RELEVANT SERPs.


Won&#039;t you Please, Please, listen to Search Engines Web



Make Yahoo&#039;s SERPs more relevant than Google&#039;s and the rewards will be astounding
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/// A year or two from now perhaps it will show you where those gas stations are, but only when you are low on gas. So you get information on an as needed, when needed basis without explicitly asking for it. In the same vein, we will move from information retrieval to information supply</p>
<p>There is always the fear of being TOO Dependant on this technology &#8211; because eventually there will be Outages</p>
<p>The hi-tech that will allow this technology to be realized  will probably demand continuous ultra high processing power and continuously tracking and archiving personal-preferences information about the users.</p>
<p>While processing power will become a relatively cheap commodity &#8211; the privacy implications of continous tracking/archiving   are of concern to some.  Society must decide if giving up privacy is worth being passive.</p>
<p>Anyways, everyone will imitate each others&#8217;  features, &#8230; within MONTHs after being introduced.</p>
<p>So, the bottom line is, &#8230;all of these features are interesting and nice, but&#8230;&#8230;NOTHING, can supplant the fact that Search engines &#8211; with or without a box &#8211; must have Extremely RELEVANT SERPs.</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t you Please, Please, listen to Search Engines Web</p>
<p>Make Yahoo&#8217;s SERPs more relevant than Google&#8217;s and the rewards will be astounding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
