<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Y!Q: Adding Context to Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rukshan</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Rukshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-803</guid>
		<description>how can i add a yhoo search on my webpage
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can i add a yhoo search on my webpage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-802</guid>
		<description>I think this clustering one should be a good start www.topgist.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this clustering one should be a good start <a href="http://www.topgist.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.topgist.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanaeem</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanaeem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-801</guid>
		<description>I do love Y!Q but one think is odd to me.Why yahoo given browser button for it.They could simply add it to toolbar.That woyld be easier.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do love Y!Q but one think is odd to me.Why yahoo given browser button for it.They could simply add it to toolbar.That woyld be easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaveh</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaveh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 02:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Anyone remember or heard of FizzyLab ... a Seattle-based company, in operation back in 1999-2001?

Content Relevator ... Ad Relavator? OK, may be the product names weren&#039;t exactly cool, but the products certainly were. Content Relevator was Y!Q and Ad Relevator was Google&#039;s AdSense.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone remember or heard of FizzyLab &#8230; a Seattle-based company, in operation back in 1999-2001?</p>
<p>Content Relevator &#8230; Ad Relavator? OK, may be the product names weren&#8217;t exactly cool, but the products certainly were. Content Relevator was Y!Q and Ad Relevator was Google&#8217;s AdSense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afzali</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>afzali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I added your new search Y!Q on my site for example see this page: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fafzali.com/ttak/archives/000065.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fafzali.com/ttak/archives/000065.html&lt;/a&gt;  but at results i saw unknown characters
why?
thanks
bye
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added your new search Y!Q on my site for example see this page: <a href="http://www.fafzali.com/ttak/archives/000065.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fafzali.com/ttak/archives/000065.html</a>  but at results i saw unknown characters<br />
why?<br />
thanks<br />
bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Day</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 15:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Hi Daisy, it sounds very presumptious of you to state the just because I don&#039;t agree with your opinion that it must be because I &quot;just don&#039;t know how to use Blinkx&quot;. How arrogant you are! I found blinkx to frequently return irrelevant results. Coupled with its inflexibile approach to searching my conclusion was that is was pretty hopeless. Despite drawbacks, to be expected in a new test release, Y!Q by comparison seemed a breath of fresh air.

You guys at Yahoo! keep up the good work. With all the recent new features you&#039;ve added, Yahoo Search is getting better by the day. Thanks!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daisy, it sounds very presumptious of you to state the just because I don&#8217;t agree with your opinion that it must be because I &#8220;just don&#8217;t know how to use Blinkx&#8221;. How arrogant you are! I found blinkx to frequently return irrelevant results. Coupled with its inflexibile approach to searching my conclusion was that is was pretty hopeless. Despite drawbacks, to be expected in a new test release, Y!Q by comparison seemed a breath of fresh air.</p>
<p>You guys at Yahoo! keep up the good work. With all the recent new features you&#8217;ve added, Yahoo Search is getting better by the day. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amit agarwal</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>amit agarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 06:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Will it be possible to add site specific search to YIQ.

I see this as a hack to show all my related posts of my blog in a post.

Thanks,
Amit Agarwal
&lt;a href=&quot;http://labnol.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://labnol.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will it be possible to add site specific search to YIQ.</p>
<p>I see this as a hack to show all my related posts of my blog in a post.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Amit Agarwal<br />
<a href="http://labnol.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://labnol.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daisy</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Daisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 23:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Daisy~  I don&#039;t agree.  I find that Blinkx is way more flexible than Y!Q search.  I have not YET received any relevant information from my searches.  I even went ahead and compared the two engines.  Blinkx was much more intuitive AND, i got back relevant data.  Maybe you just don&#039;t know how to use Blinkx.  If you did, you&#039;d agree with me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daisy~  I don&#8217;t agree.  I find that Blinkx is way more flexible than Y!Q search.  I have not YET received any relevant information from my searches.  I even went ahead and compared the two engines.  Blinkx was much more intuitive AND, i got back relevant data.  Maybe you just don&#8217;t know how to use Blinkx.  If you did, you&#8217;d agree with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-795</guid>
		<description>I cant get it to work! I downloaded it and am highlighting, but it never seems to bring me back what I am looking for. Also, what is the difference between highlighting and typing it in? I need something that will just search for me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant get it to work! I downloaded it and am highlighting, but it never seems to bring me back what I am looking for. Also, what is the difference between highlighting and typing it in? I need something that will just search for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ID:entity</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>ID:entity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2005/02/02/yq-adding-context-to-search/#comment-794</guid>
		<description>The name of the global reconnaissance agent was powerscout.

The paper can be found here (No 1 result)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=reconnaissance+agent+%2B+MIT+%2B.pdf&amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;toggle=1&amp;ei=UTF-8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=reconnaissance+agent+%2B+MIT+%2B.pdf&amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;toggle=1&amp;ei=UTF-8&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name of the global reconnaissance agent was powerscout.</p>
<p>The paper can be found here (No 1 result)</p>
<p><a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=reconnaissance+agent+%2B+MIT+%2B.pdf&#038;fr=FP-tab-web-t&#038;toggle=1&#038;ei=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=reconnaissance+agent+%2B+MIT+%2B.pdf&#038;fr=FP-tab-web-t&#038;toggle=1&#038;ei=UTF-8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
