<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Cookin&#8217; at Yahoo! Next</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ysearchblog.com/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>um, so what happened to the sidebar search display? I like my search results listed on the side search bar, so I can just open them up to be displayed on the right (like msn, lycos, etc still do)... any way to restore that look/feel?

thx
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, so what happened to the sidebar search display? I like my search results listed on the side search bar, so I can just open them up to be displayed on the right (like msn, lycos, etc still do)&#8230; any way to restore that look/feel?</p>
<p>thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TugJobs</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>TugJobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>the feeling that i get from this is that combined with registered user data, you will be attempting to a) raise the mental switching cost for search engine regulars and b) capture query and activity information for users - some of whom might fall into the realm of oddball or (gasp!) just plain wrong
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the feeling that i get from this is that combined with registered user data, you will be attempting to a) raise the mental switching cost for search engine regulars and b) capture query and activity information for users &#8211; some of whom might fall into the realm of oddball or (gasp!) just plain wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 05:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because it IS a play on the furl/spurl/delicious game, along with Eurekster/A9.com/Askjeeves etc. It&#039;s just where everyone is headed at this point. No doubt you&#039;ll see Google&#039;s and MSN&#039;s version in the near future.

The thing Yahoo has always excelled at beyond their competitors is the integration of a wide variety of services/content (even though some weren&#039;t so great individually), and it&#039;s for this very reason they also have the largest potential in the use of this technology.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because it IS a play on the furl/spurl/delicious game, along with Eurekster/A9.com/Askjeeves etc. It&#8217;s just where everyone is headed at this point. No doubt you&#8217;ll see Google&#8217;s and MSN&#8217;s version in the near future.</p>
<p>The thing Yahoo has always excelled at beyond their competitors is the integration of a wide variety of services/content (even though some weren&#8217;t so great individually), and it&#8217;s for this very reason they also have the largest potential in the use of this technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvander</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>cvander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this the same that you allready had in research.yahoo.com?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this the same that you allready had in research.yahoo.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave carpe</title>
		<link>http://www.ysearchblog.com/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>dave carpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ysearchblog.com/blog/2004/10/07/whats-cookin-at-yahoo-next/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>uh, is this a good thing? why can&#039;t this function as a client and in turn deny yahoo the ability to cull, store and otherwise investigate user search patterns? the feeling that i get from this is that combined with registered user data, you will be attempting to a) raise the mental switching cost for search engine regulars and b) capture query and activity information for users - some of whom might fall into the realm of oddball or (gasp!) just plain wrong...also, feels like a bit of a play on the furl/spurl/delicious game, particularly if you ever allow people to share their &quot;mysearch&quot; repositories..

just my opinion, of course...

oh, and btw, what you *saw* was a wok in that restaurant - but really, that food was all being microwaved in the back kitchen...just cold stuff being reheated ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh, is this a good thing? why can&#8217;t this function as a client and in turn deny yahoo the ability to cull, store and otherwise investigate user search patterns? the feeling that i get from this is that combined with registered user data, you will be attempting to a) raise the mental switching cost for search engine regulars and b) capture query and activity information for users &#8211; some of whom might fall into the realm of oddball or (gasp!) just plain wrong&#8230;also, feels like a bit of a play on the furl/spurl/delicious game, particularly if you ever allow people to share their &#8220;mysearch&#8221; repositories..</p>
<p>just my opinion, of course&#8230;</p>
<p>oh, and btw, what you *saw* was a wok in that restaurant &#8211; but really, that food was all being microwaved in the back kitchen&#8230;just cold stuff being reheated ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
